I heart FeedBurner

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Pageflakes

Subscribe in podnova

Add News Issues Trends USA Media to ODEO

Receive IM, Email or Mobile alerts when new content is published on this site.

Add to Attensa

Add to Webwag

Add to fwicki

Add to netomat Hub

Add to Excite MIX

Subscribe in NewsAlloy

Add to Plusmo

Add to The Free Dictionary

Subscribe in Bloglines

Add to netvibes

Add to My AOL

Subscribe in Rojo

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Share

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

CT Dems Charge WWE Violated Campaign Finance Law By Removing Necrophilia Video


Connecticut Democrats filed a Federal Elections Commission complaint today against Linda McMahon, her campaign and World Wrestling Entertainment, charging they violated the law by removing racy WWE videos last month.

McMahon (R-CT) is one of several candidates hoping to challenge Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) next year. She is the former CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment and wife of WWE principal Vince McMahon.

After TPMDC and others posted videos of WWE scenes depicting simulated rape and a wrestler pretending to have sex with a corpse, they were taken down from YouTube.

We spoke at the time to WWE's VP of PR and corporate communications, who said accusations the removal had anything to do with politics are false, but Democrats charge the move is equivalent to a campaign contribution from a corporation.

"It's an ongoing battle with online piracy," Robert Zimmerman told TPMDC. "It's copyrighted material, it's our intellectual property."

He said they "scour" the Internet for their videos and said they go after all of them, not just ones used for political purposes, adding: "We would love to be able to take everything down."

But the Democrats suggest that WWE removing the videos is considered an "in-kind corporate contribution" because the corporation did not remove the more than 500,000 videos that also could be considered copyrighted.

They have asked the FEC investigate and "impose the maximum fines permitted for such violations."

"WWE has selectively enforced its rights only insofar as they benefit Ms. McMahon's candidacy. The facts demonstrate that WWE made expenditures in connection with an election, in clear violation of FECA," the complaint charges. "WWE expended its corporate resources - including the time of Mr. Zimmerman and other corporate personnel, and its attorneys - all used in the service of Ms. McMahon's campaign to force YouTube to remove only the videos that reflected poorly on Ms. McMahon, while ignoring the multitude of other WWE-owned material still hosted on YouTube."

McMahon spokesman Ed Patru called the charge a "baseless accusation" and said the campaign has complied with all FEC rules and regulations.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

CompuTech Solution

Text Widget

Bookmark and Share